According to last year’s 60 Minutes/Vanity Fair magazine survey that asked Americans from different backgrounds and various political persuasions, “which past president they believed they would bring back to fix the economy,” conservative republicans overwhelmingly chose Ronald Reagan while liberal democrats significantly leaned toward FDR, as their first and second choices. This came as no surprise to most people who would agree, with some reservations, that the Reaganomics of the eighties and the New Deal of the thirties have gotten the country out of the tough economic spots those two presidents’ administration found them in.
It is remarkable on the one hand that some would gladly bring back dead presidents to fix today’s problems. This does nothing but accentuate the impotence of those who presently aspire to ascend to the highest office of the land. On the other hand, there is a bit of short-sightedness in voters arguing over which presidential candidate would be better suited than the incumbent president to handle the economy without regard for other variables in the equations of this disastrous economy. There is a greater reality that is being largely overlooked, and it is an astonishing fact, or perhaps not, that those who profess to uphold a faith that claims God as the Creator of the universe are lost in the political diatribes just like the rest of the world, and they are not paying attention to the possible correlation between Americans’ attitude toward God and the economy.
I am not suggesting a superstitious way of looking at the present situation. It is quite alright to be pragmatic and acknowledge that the application of the basic principles of micro and macro-economics, as well as making good fiscal decisions based on sound economic ideology may contribute to a stronger economy. However, for those who read the Bible, the prophets, Haggai and Amos, have provided great insights into the possibility of God using disastrous economic conditions as a means to bring attention to Himself.
Sole human knowledge is insufficient to remedy to the woes of this present economy. It would take a president who would be willing to act on God’s behalf, and pushing for national reconciliation, to fix the troubled economy. Since I am not in favor of bringing back the dead, I would say that it may take someone with the fortitude of an Abraham Lincoln or the courage and understanding of a Martin Luther King Jr., even though he was not a president, to succeed in that endeavor.
These two took giant steps and made formidable godly decisions to unite the country, and they paid for the success of their mission with their lives. Today, we are faced with an unprecedented division in this country, and in the midst of a disdain that seems to have reached its fullness, who will be willing to be the next martyr as it appears obvious that these two icons –Lincoln and King – acted as the mouthpieces of God and paid the ultimate price?
Let us see together how they did it.
On June 16, 1858, a deeply convicted Abraham Lincoln stood up and gave a speech about a “house divided” before an Illinois convention. “A house divided against itself cannot stand,” he said. “I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.” This was something he reiterated at the height of the Civil War when he gave his ever famous Gettysburg’s Address on November 19, 1863, “Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived [in liberty] and so dedicated [to the proposition that all men are created equal] can long endure [half slave and half free].”
A retrospective look at this moment, and looking at other documents by the same author, assures us that he was primarily concerned about slavery possibly ripping the nation apart. The threat he perceived was correctly assessed, politically speaking; but as urgent as it was to rid the country of the evil of this form of slavery, that only constituted the tip of the iceberg.
The larger issue was the inability for southern Christians to recognize the violence that was being done to God Himself in dividing the body of Christ – an offense even more severe in the eyes of the Creator of the universe than the subjection and oppression of Americans of African descent, some of whom were their brethren in the faith. The dehumanization of dark-skinned Americans was endemic to the dominant culture in the south – Americans who professed to be Christian, and it averred to be a natural result stemming from a disdain for the truth and for God.
While Lincoln’s endearing piece of oratory marvel – the Gettysburg’s Address, acknowledged yet in its time as a masterpiece of verbal discourse, still holds our countrymen in awe even today, it was in reality a prophetic biblical message couched in careful political language that fit the occasion. Unlike most of the rest of the nation, the president understood that a mighty, loving and just God could not possibly look down from Heaven, witness the subhuman conditions that a group of human beings who claimed allegiance to Him was inflicting upon their brethren, hear the sufferers’ cries for deliverance, and look the other way.
Lincoln was astonishingly well imbued of the Creator’s judgment upon the citizens of America. He declared it in his second inaugural address in no uncertain terms: “Fondly do we hope—fervently do we pray—that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-men’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn by the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said ‘the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether.’”
Sadly, America did not understand then, nor does she understand today that God has not withdrawn into a corner of Heaven waiting for His Son to come and rapture the Church, but He is alive and active and still judging the deeds of mankind all over the globe. Not just content to display such great insight into the divine reason for the civil war, President Lincoln also proclaimed, upon the urging of his son Robert’s future father-in-law, a day of fasting and prayer for the nation’s “presumptuous sins” of having “forgotten God.” In doing so, he followed in the footsteps of other prophets who made similar claims about biblical Israel: Isaiah (17:10), Jeremiah (2:32, 3:21, 13:25, 18:15, 23:27), Ezekiel (22:12), and Hosea (4:6, 8:14, 13:6).
While Lincoln made no explicit personal claim to Christianity, his actions fell in line with the Christian mandate for humankind: “Love God and love fellow human beings.” Lincoln’s America, in major part, failed to fulfill both. Edward Everett, the most eloquent orator in the country at the time, who delivered a breath-taking message for two hours at Gettysburg before Lincoln’s two-minute address, said it best when he wrote to president Lincoln, “I should be glad, if I could flatter myself that I came as near to the central idea of the occasion, in two hours, as you did in two minutes.”
The central idea was something that was always in the heart of the president. It is the centerpiece of human existence and the main point of the eternal divine message to mankind. It is therefore no small wonder that, although he was concerned about the soldiers and their families, Lincoln thought that Americans, rather than to dedicate a cemetery for the dead, should instead dedicate their lives “to the great task remaining before us,… that this nation [is together] under God,… and that government of the people, by the people, for the people [does] not perish from the earth.” In other words, God has instituted government to care for the people, because life is all about love for God and people.
Lincoln was taken down by an assassin’s bullet, and so went down in modern history the killing of one more prophet of God. The “new birth of freedom” that he visualized never completely materialized, and a dream had to be deferred. Despite his Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, evil kept its grip on the nation. While there was an appearance of progress for Americans of African descent who went from being slaves to being a free people, evil only downgraded for them from dehumanization to degradation, as they moved from being less than human to being second-class citizens. It would take another century for the next American national prophet to show up in the person of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and it took King’s I Have a Dream speech on the steps of the Lincoln memorial in Washington, DC. in 1963 to compel America to dream again and “let freedom ring!”
From an early age, Dr. King has shown signs that he was practically cast into the role of the great Emancipator’s successor. He was only fifteen years old, and a junior in Booker T. Washington high school on his way to college, when he won a speech contest. The speech was entitled “The Negro and the Constitution,” and whether or not he got help in drafting it has been debated. Regardless, he closed on a note that showed his understanding of Lincoln’s prophetic role in this grand task of rectifying America’s wrongs. He said, “My heart throbs anew in the hope that, inspired by the example of Lincoln, imbued with the spirit of Christ, [America] will cast down the last barrier to perfect freedom, … and I with my brothers of blackest hue possessing at last my rightful heritage and holding my head erect, may stand beside the Saxon – a negro – and yet a man.”
Dr. King was called by God to deal with the evil of segregation. This evil had been perpetuated by many Christians as being divinely ordained. Segregation was deceiving and dangerous, not only because it was injurious to colored people, but also because it had some semblance of biblical legitimacy, and it was definitely a legal social construct. Its legality put the beneficiaries of the system at ease in applying its most cruel laws while it severely oppressed its victims by curtailing several of their civil rights. The system’s dark side could only be visible in the light of the biblical mandate for Christians to love God and other people. How could good Christians find it in their heart to despise Christians of a different race when the Bible clearly says that “all who believe in Jesus will not perish, but have eternal life?” [John 3:16]
Does not all include everyone? Even if Christians should think that God loves some of His children more than others, would that give them the right to act on that assumption in making segregation the law of the southern states? Is not the measure of love that they must show their fellow human beings clearly stated in the command to “love your neighbor like yourself?”
We can all acknowledge that it is indeed very hard to love people who do not love us, and Dr. King knew it. He struggled with it. He talked about it. He preached about it. After many personal struggles, he came to the conclusion that there was no other way to overcome the evil forces of segregation. In a Christmas sermon entitled “Loving Your Enemies” given at his Dexter Avenue pastorate, he declared, “Men must see that force begets force, hate begets hate, toughness begets toughness … Somebody must have sense enough and morality enough to cut off the chain of hate and the chain of evil in the universe. And you do that by love.” Nonviolent or passive resistance became the symbol of application of that love, and through it Dr. King led the Civil Rights movement to success.
However, King’s calling was greater than to bring about civil rights and dignity to Americans of African descent. He was called to play the role of a prophet. He reminded America that she had defaulted on her “promissory note” to provide freedom and justice for all her citizens. He wanted to hold the government accountable for the just welfare of all of its citizens equally as per the Declaration of Independence. On the steps of the Lincoln memorial, he affirmed, “No, no, we are not satisfied and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.” The bolded part of the statement which came to be attributed to Dr. King is rather authored by the biblical prophet Amos (5:24).
As for King’s signature prophetic message, it would come on the eve of his brutal assassination. On that blustery day when the storms and the tornado warnings should have kept the masses at home, an indirect request suggested by their strong showing was made for the reverend to come and comfort them in their distress. It was certainly visible to the doctor’s entourage that the people had flocked to hear him rather than anyone else. It was not just his charisma that attracted them, but he personified hope – a hope for justice and freedom for them, their nation, and the world.
On that evening, in the Masonic Temple in Memphis, TN, Martin Luther King Jr. gave perhaps the most significant speech of his entire career. Dr. King delivered his extemporaneous message with an inner vibrancy, defying his fatigue previously raised as an impediment to his presence, to a wonderful crowd that braved the stormy weather, as well to those whose eyes were glued on their television screens or their ears to the radio. He said, as if he had a premonition of his death, “…I’ve seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people will get to the promised land.”
Those were not mere words of encouragement. They emanated from a profound conviction that things could not be otherwise. They welled up from his heart to his lips as if originated from higher Wisdom. “I’m not concerned about [longevity] now,” he confirmed before that; “I just want to do God’s will.” Those were the words of a prophet of God, the last national prophet that America has known.
Like Lincoln, he sought to hold America true to her principles. Like he, he was taken down by an assassin’s bullet. America had killed another one of its prophets. When John Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln at close range, he was convinced he was doing the nation a favor. When Martin Luther King Jr. was gunned down, many saw him as a threat to the stability of a nation already at war.
Both Lincoln and King were incredibly brave people who served the cause of God and the needy in their frail humanity. They were both criticized for their unevangelistic Christianity. That is because they chose to reject Christianity in its vain form as practiced by the majority, but embraced its substance. They were imperfect, but God still used them just He used the prophets of old. Moses was a murderer, David was a murderer and an adulterer, Elijah suffered from depression, Jeremiah had low self-esteem in his youth, Jonah had open hatred for an entire people, but God still used them. However, those two – Lincoln and King – taught us that in the land of the free and the home of the brave, one can be free to believe in the divine truth, but the bravery in proclaiming it must be accompanied by a readiness to die.
As the general elections approach, I am not holding my breath to find out which of the candidates who claim Christianity as their mantle is ready to emulate Lincoln in his boldness to live out his Christianity, or which one of them will be, like Dr. King, endowed with Godly wisdom to make the right decisions that will save the nation. As I see it, if America does not come together as one to repent before Almighty God, our nation will perish in its economic quagmire, and that, dear reader, may become the primary campaign issue for a presidential candidate to be worthy of serious consideration.